<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									A question of physics.. - Guitar Players Discussion				            </title>
            <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/</link>
            <description>Guitar Noise Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 12:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67294</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m kind of amazed at how far this thread went. Who would have thought?Greg, I do have a window to out, but a man has to save something to do for the afternoons. :lol:]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm kind of amazed at how far this thread went. Who would have thought?<br><br>Greg, I do have a window to out, but a man has to save something to do for the afternoons. :lol:]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>Narn</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67294</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67137</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[As musicians, we intuitively give more energy to thicker strings... it&#039;s the only way to maintain the same volume when you change strings :)]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[As musicians, we intuitively give more energy to thicker strings... it's the only way to maintain the same volume when you change strings <br><br>:)]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>NoteBoat</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67137</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67132</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Now if we&#039;re talking same offset (i.e., plucking displacement), the the denser string sustains longer since it received more energy to begin.

Greg,That&#039;s all I said &quot;All other things being ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Now if we're talking same offset (i.e., plucking displacement), the the denser string sustains longer since it received more energy to begin.

Greg,<br>That's all I said "<I>All other things being equal</I> a string of greater mass will vibrate longer than one of less mass"<br>

G-<br><br>You've chosen the "equal" to be string displacement. I choose to it to be the energy input. This is where we differ. <br><br>-G]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>gnease</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67132</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67103</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Now if we&#039;re talking same offset (i.e., plucking displacement), the the denser string sustains longer since it received more energy to begin.

Greg,That&#039;s all I said &quot;All other things being ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Now if we're talking same offset (i.e., plucking displacement), the the denser string sustains longer since it received more energy to begin.

Greg,<br>That's all I said "<I>All other things being equal</I> a string of greater mass will vibrate longer than one of less mass"<br>Laz's explanation is the important one here. Most of the decay occurs due to coupling of the string's energy into the guitar -- through the nut/fret and bridge (bigtime in acoustic guitars) and the magnetic drag of the pups.

Which is why I didn't mention it - it has nothing to do with the original question.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>greybeard</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67103</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67055</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[another addition to sustain is how much feedback(vibrations) the body projects in the bridge, the strings are vibrating the bridge and the rest of the guitar, but the bridge is vibrating the...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[another addition to sustain is how much feedback(vibrations) the body projects in the bridge, the strings are vibrating the bridge and the rest of the guitar, but the bridge is vibrating the strings after you have strummed or plucked them, this presents achallenge to guitar makers, because less reinforcement on the bridge will give the guitar more sustain, but too little could collapse the guitar]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>Snoogans775</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67055</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67052</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Greybeard-Energy goes in; energy comes out. Given purely mechanical considerations, it is not obvious by a string of higher mass would continue to vibrate longer. If the endpoints are perfec...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Greybeard-<br><br>Energy goes in; energy comes out. Given purely mechanical considerations, it is not obvious by a string of higher mass would continue to vibrate longer. If the endpoints are perfect (no energy loss), the places were energy leaves the system are primarily two: friction in the flexing string ends (heat loss) and energy transfer to the air, in both frictional losses and acoustic coupling. Given all this, the string provided with the most vibrational energy will probably vibrate the longest. Put the same energy into two strings of different mass/length, the one with lower mass-per-length will have to undergo larger transverse (side-to-side) amplitude to store the same energy as the other string. Now it could be argued that since frictional losses are highly non-linear and related to transverse velocity as well as string flex angle, that the string undergoing the largest vibrational amplitude might tend to decay (lose energy) faster. But this ends up being offset by two other factors: Thinner strings (less mass=per-length) will have lower frictional losses in bending and experience lower fictional loss and lower acoustic coupling to the air. So again, it's not obvious that more mass-per-length wins an <U>equal</U> energy sustain contest. <br><br>Now if we're talking same offset (i.e., plucking displacement), the the denser string sustains longer since it received more energy to begin.<br><br>Laz's explanation is the important one here. Most of the decay occurs due to coupling of the string's energy into the guitar -- through the nut/fret and bridge (bigtime in acoustic guitars) and the magnetic drag of the pups.<br><br>-Greg]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>gnease</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67052</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67049</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[The pitch of a string is determined by the mass, the tension, and the string length.  By mass, I mean mass per inch of string.  Thicker strings are generally lower in pitch, because they hav...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The pitch of a string is determined by the mass, the tension, and the string length.  By mass, I mean mass per inch of string.  Thicker strings are generally lower in pitch, because they have more mass.  Given six strings of equal length, as on a guitar, you can lower the pitch by either increasing the mass per inch of a particular string, or lowering the tension.  Since strings with different tensions feel very different, it's done with mass.  To increase the mass you can either make the string of a more massive material, or you can increase the thickness of the string.  Steel strings are done by increasing their diameter, because it's a bit difficult to change tha mass of steel.  Nylon strings use changes in string material a bit more, so they can get away with diameters closer to that of the other strings.<br><br>To answer these questions directly:
1) If we make a set of strings in which two strings of equal mass have different diameters, which of the two will have the lower frequency? Why?<br><br>2) If we make a set of strings where two strings of the same diameter have different masses which will have the lower frequency? Why?
1) They will be exactly the same.  The thicker string will probably have a different tone than the thinner one, but it will have the same pitch if both strings are at the same tension.<br><br>2) The more massive string will have the lower frequency.<br><br>The reason a more massive string vibrates at a lower pitch is because of its inertia.  Any string with tension on it has a force pulling it straight, which is proportional to the tension on the string.  When you pluck it, the force pulls it back.  A string with greater mass accelerates on the way back more slowly because is has more inertia resisting that acceleration.  Since it changes direction more slowly, it takes longer to return to center, pass across, continue past center, and come back to center again.  More time to complete one oscillation.  The time taken is called the <I>period</I> (T) of the oscillation.  A longer period means a lower frequency (the frequency is the inverse of the period.  f=1/T).]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>paul donnelly</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/paged/2/#post-67049</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/#post-67021</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I was talking purely about the characteristics of the string - what a guitar body or bridge does to the vibrations is another matter - the question related to strings.All other things being ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[I was talking purely about the characteristics of the string - what a guitar body or bridge does to the vibrations is another matter - the question related to strings.<br>All other things being equal a string of greater mass will vibrate longer than one of less mass.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>greybeard</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/#post-67021</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/#post-67015</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[If you wonder why I wonder it was just a musing on how string makers come up with their product. If mass is the detirming factor in pitch you could have all of you strings the same size, but...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[If you wonder why I wonder it was just a musing on how string makers come up with their product. If mass is the detirming factor in pitch you could have all of you strings the same size, but varying in mass. If mass has a significant affect could you not then put any string at any location and acheive the correct pitch by use of tension alone? Wouldn't that look funky?<br><br>I gotta find something else to think about at work.

If you check out the tensions on the tuned strings (D'Addario and TI list these), you will find they have a fairly symmetrical balance E = e, A = B, D = G.  Tensions are slightly higher in the center of the fingerboard (D and G). Why? My guesses:<br><br>Well balanced tensions among the strings make them easier to play -- a better, more consistent feel from string to string. Slightly higher tension on the center strings works well, because that's where most players will naturally apply a bit more pressure (better grip, leverage).<br><br>A symmetrical profile of tensions will be less likely to cause neck twisting, plus the higher tensioned center strings work directly against the strongest, thickest, truss-barred part of the neck.<br><br>Why vary diameter instead of density? It's much easier to change the mass/length this way than find different density materials that actually make good strings.<br><br>Don't you have a window at work you can look out?<br><br>-Greg]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>gnease</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/#post-67015</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: A question of physics..</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/#post-67007</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[My head hurts.. :cry:]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[My head hurts.. :cry:]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>purplefenderstrat</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/a-question-of-physics/#post-67007</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		