<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Question about quality - Guitar Players Discussion				            </title>
            <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/question-about-quality/</link>
            <description>Guitar Noise Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 03:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Question about quality</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/question-about-quality/#post-156734</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 02:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;ll find that both guild and seagul come highly recommended here genereally speaking so it&#039;ll come down to personal preference.  Seeing as how he&#039;s having trouble with the guild, ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[I think you'll find that both guild and seagul come highly recommended here genereally speaking so it'll come down to personal preference.  Seeing as how he's having trouble with the guild, I would take it back, try out the seagul and if I liked it more wouldn't hesitate to trade it up.  Remember that sound is important when choosing a guitar, but so is playability.  I myself can't compare the two because I'm not overly experienced with guilds...but I can say, and have many times, that seaguls are great guitars and you won't regret having one.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>JasonColucci</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/question-about-quality/#post-156734</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Question about quality</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/question-about-quality/#post-15200</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 02:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Does anyone have any opinions about the quality of the Guild series especially the GAD-40C? or do you think that the Seagull S6 is a better guitar.  My father is having some trouble getting ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Does anyone have any opinions about the quality of the Guild series especially the GAD-40C? or do you think that the Seagull S6 is a better guitar.  My father is having some trouble getting his Guild set-up, seems the action is very high.  It is 1/8 on the low e with .09.  He is thinking of bringing it back and buying a Seagull S6 cedar or spruce what is the difference in tone. They seems to be highly recommended.  There is almost a saving of $300 .  Thanking you in advance]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>greg232</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/question-about-quality/#post-15200</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		