<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Tusq v. Bone nuts - Guitar Players Discussion				            </title>
            <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/tusq-v-bone-nuts/</link>
            <description>Guitar Noise Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 10:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>Re: Tusq v. Bone nuts</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/tusq-v-bone-nuts/#post-271066</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[would probably go for the bone, it&#039;s well known that i&#039;m an avid abuser of the environment.tusq would work :wink:]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.graphtech.com/tusq_info.php">http://www.graphtech.com/tusq_info.php</a><br><a href="http://www.soft.com.sg/forum/showthread.php?t=25946">http://www.soft.com.sg/forum/showthread.php?t=25946</a><br><a href="http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26731">http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26731</a><br><a href="http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=62124">http://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=62124</a><br><a href="https://www.graphtech.com/weblog/index.php">https://www.graphtech.com/weblog/index.php</a><br><br>i would probably go for the bone, it's well known that i'm an avid abuser of the environment.<br>tusq would work :wink:]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>TwistedLefty</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/tusq-v-bone-nuts/#post-271066</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Tusq v. Bone nuts</title>
                        <link>https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/tusq-v-bone-nuts/#post-28919</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[on my epi lp, i&#039;m planning on upgrading the nut.i was looking at replacement ones at stewmac.com, and i&#039;m stuck between choosing a bone or a tusq nut. what are the advantages and disadvantag...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[on my epi lp, i'm planning on upgrading the nut.<br><br>i was looking at replacement ones at stewmac.com, and i'm stuck between choosing a bone or a tusq nut. <br><br>what are the advantages and disadvantages of each? is one of them generally "better?"<br>what about the slip stone/ delrin nuts that stewmac also offers?]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/">Guitar Players Discussion</category>                        <dc:creator>blackzerogsh</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://guitarnoise.forum/guitar-players-discussion/tusq-v-bone-nuts/#post-28919</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		